Skip to main content

Grammatical Error


So, my friend sent a reply to my post on April 8th; he liked it and thought it was funny. So did I, until I read over it again. I found a grammatical error. Perfect. Now, it's all I can see. I proofed that damn entry three times (just like I'm going to proof this one...and cross my fingers.) and I still screwed up (it was the "Dumb" entry). Is there a lesson to this? Yep! In fact, there are two. Firstly, I ain't gonna change it! That error is there forever! I mean, it's blogger, I can change that error with a "point and a click". And I was going to, but the theme of this entry is "mistakes"; I must work harder to make sure it doesn't happen again. To reiterate, that error is there forever! And...scene!

Second, proof every entry four
times!

I just finished "Meet the Robinsons" so mistakes are cool now.

Meet the Robinsons


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bald is Beautiful

 T his video has all of the feels! @eva_barilaro After months growing my ##hair for the first time in 10 years I had to ask my ##boyfriend to ##shave my ##head again... first time was my granddad. ♬ Just the Way You Are - Boyce Avenue

White House says it is creating 'very large' dossier on Washington Post journalist and others.

    This is not okay.   For the record, I hate the phrase "This is not okay", but this is NOT okay.  To be fair, I'm certain that he's not the first POTUS to create dossiers on, well, anyone.  But this is an intimidation tactic, plain and simple.  I mean, POTUS is pretty fucking lazy, so there may not be any dossiers.        'Cept, his folks will have to do whatever he tells them to do either because it's their job or because of the allure of power...and maybe out of some sick form of civic duty.        As if gathering info of journalists in order to shut them up is patriotic.        Last I checked, it was the very antithesis of the American way .      November 2nd can't get here soon enough.         This is not a myth, POTUS.